Newman’s Apologia

newman picJohn Henry Newman’s Apologia Pro Vita Sua is an excellent book that I would not recommend to most people. If I had attempted it in high school, I would have failed. Even if I had tried in college, I suspect I would have received very little benefit from it. But having become acquainted with Newman’s writings and his life, I became very interested in the controversy surrounding his entrance into the Catholic Church, and was very eager to follow the path which eventually led him to Rome.

The work I want to compare the Apologia with right away is St. Augustine’s book of Confessions, and the circumstances occasioning these works are quite different. The word “confession” as Augustine uses it, is not so much the penitential confession of sins committed, as it is a confession of the goodness God has worked in his life. Augustine is confessing to his readers the praiseworthy things God has done, so that his readers may in turn praise God. Newman’s work, on the other hand, is an Apologia, a defense of his own integrity. A certain writer accuses Newman of having pretended to be Anglican while he had already become Roman Catholic, and of having used his position as an Anglican clergyman to deceptively lead to the Roman Catholic Church. This accusation is made by putting together a number of his statements and giving them a peculiar interpretation. In order to answer this charge, instead of addressing each accusation one-by-one, he decides to give a positive response in the form of a history of his religious opinions, fully documented from his own writings and correspondence.

Westminster_Abbey_-_03And the result is excellent. Newman appears as someone wholly dedicated to his commitment to the Anglican Church, even beginning the Oxford Movement so as to set the doctrine of the Anglican Church on an even firmer foundation. He endeavors to demonstrate that the Anglican Church is “Catholic” in the truest sense of the term, even more so than the Church of Rome. Eventually, he arrives at doubt concerning the position of these two Churches, as to which has more truly maintained the Apostolic faith. The tension between his dedication to the English Church and to truth reminds me of that other great English saint, who at his execution says, I die the king’s faithful servant, but God’s first.

What is remarkable to me is how long the whole matter took. It is two years from his first doubts until he reaches a point where he can no longer preach honestly from an Anglican pulpit. And yet even from this point, it is another two years until he seeks to enter communion with the Roman Catholic Church. For Newman, it wasn’t a matter of hearing some one particular syllogism or receiving one key piece of evidence. It was, as he describes, an “aggregate of probabilities” and the gradual shape of his thought’s development seems to parallel his thought on the development of Christian doctrine as this occurs in the Church as a whole. He several times speaks of his distaste for syllogisms and logic: “All the logic in the world would not have made me move faster towards Rome than I did.” The changing of his mind was something more integral and complete: “It is the concrete being that reasons; pass a number of years, and I find my mind in a new place; how? The whole man moves; paper logic is but the record of it.”

The importance of this tendency in Newman was confirmed by comment made by someone overhearing me talk about Newman: “Newman is great to read; but if you are ever trying to quote the key line in an argument of his, you will have a miserable time!” Not that Newman is unreasonable, but that his thought takes in so much data and so many arguments, that the result is not reducible to a single syllogism. It is this quality of Newman that makes him at once excellent and difficult to evaluate.

daniel derondaAt the end, I want to include here George Eliot’s appreciation of this work. She was an agnostic and no Christian, and yet her best characters are always aiming at an understanding that truly accounts for human experience. In one letter she said, “I envy you your opportunity of seeing and hearing Newman and should like to make an expedition to Birmingham for that sole purpose.” And in another, she gives her appraisal of the Apologia:

“I have been reading Newman’s Apologia pro Vita Sua with such absorbing interest that I found it impossible to forsake the book until I had finished it…I have been made so indignant by Kingsley’s mixture of arrogance, coarse impertinence and unscrupulousness with real intellectual incompetence, that my first interest in Newman’s answer arose from a wish to see what I consider thoroughly vicious writing thoroughly castigated. But the Apology now mainly affects me as the revelation of a life—how different in form from one’s own, yet with how close a fellowship in its needs and burthens—I mean spiritual needs and burthens.”

I have to confess that I started reading the Apologia many months ago, while I was also reading Daniel Deronda by George Eliot. While I was reading the childhood thoughts of Newman, I was also reading the backstory of the character Daniel, and the character of these two individuals lined up so well, that I cannot now sort out the details of the one from the other.

[This book is #11 of my classics challenge. I wrote most of this post before reading the last chapter on the time after his conversion. It is in this final chapter that his rhetorical power is most completely on display, and I could recommend this chapter beyond all the rest for anyone who only wanted a sense of the work.]

Edit: On the same day I posted this, I began reading Felix Holt by George Eliot. In the first pages, the narrator speaks of those who “were kept safely in the via media of indifference, and could have registered themselves in the census by a big black mark as members of the Church of England.” Without the influence of Newman, I consider it unlikely that she would have written such a line!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Newman’s Apologia

  1. Sounds interesting. I’ve read Kingsley’s accusation and the beginning of the Apologia but I’ve never gone further. I always find it interesting to hear conversion stories from former Anglicans because the Anglican Church is in many ways so similar to the Catholic Church, more similar at least than Baptists or Presbyterians.

    Liked by 1 person

    • If you’re thinking to read something by him, I think you would love the sermons he gave while still an Anglican, collected as his Parochial and Plain Sermons. They show how deeply his sense of the faith was Catholic, even while formally outside the fold, and how beautifully he expressed it!

      Louis Bouyer (incidentally, a biographer of Newman) also gives an account of his entering the Church in his Memoirs, and a lot of the same patters are there, especially the encounter with the Church Fathers.

      Like

  2. Father Max, what I remember most about you, from when you were in my class, was your closeness to God and your brilliant mind! I am so proud of you!!! Congratulations on joining the priesthood!! I followed your story from when I first heard you joined the seminary. I’ve wanted so many times to tell you how happy I am for you. My closest friend, Al McGuire, kept saying he had the nicest, young priest at his church. (In Gobles) Every week he’d tell my about your homilies and what a good priest you were. I kept asking him what your name was, but he didn’t know. He would just say how knowledgeable you were for such a young man. And then, one Sunday he said he was so sad that you were leaving his church to go to Rome. He came up to you, that day and told you what a wonderful priest you are. Do you remember him? He’s 95 years old, but doesn’t look his age at all. Al actually lives in Beverly Hills, Mi and is a member of Our Queen of Martyr Church. He owns a lumber business near in Bloomingdale, so attends your church in Gobles most Sundays throughout the year. Everyone of his children and grandchildren are Catholic and never miss a day of church! You can imagine in 95 years of life, he’s gone to many churches and has heard many more homilies!! In fact, two of his 8 sisters were nuns! So, when he says you are a wonderful priest, he knows what he’s talking about! That last Sunday, I said, “Al, did you ever figure this young priest’s name??” He said, “Yes, but with my hearing aides I couldn’t quite get it. It’s sounded like Max something.” I couldn’t believe it!!! I said, “ That’s the new priest I’ve been telling you about and how I’ve been wanting to see him!! Max Nightingale!!!” “That’s his name!! He said. Do you remember the secretary at school, Mrs. Langston? So many times we talked about going to one of your masses, but never did. We wanted to go to your ordination, but I knew you had to be invited. We had no idea you would be going to Rome. I should have known, because I have a nephew who is a priest. And all those weeks I could have gone to church with Al, if only he had known your name!! I’m a member of the Catholic Church in New Buffalo. Max, I wish you well. I’m so proud of you! Even though I didn’t know want your ambitions would be, I always thought you’d be a wonderful priest when you were in my class! God Bless you in all that you do. I’m so happy to have found you in Facebook on someone else’s page! I’ll tell Mrs. Langston, too. Thank you for all your years of hard work and dedication. We need great young priest! I’m proud to say I know you!
    Love,
    Gail and Al
    (Miss Gebhard)

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s